Please watch the Russel Brand video at the end of this article, after considering this…
All war is monstrous.
All war is murderous.
In saying nothing we passively sanction that!
Perpetuating this brutality guarantees a grim and desperate future for our young ones.
This world is EDEN. And just look what we done gone did!
(The featured Russell Brand video reveals that Boris Johnson strong-armed Zelensky into perpetuating the war in Ukraine when Zelensky wanted to negotiate peace with Russia, and America is refusing to publish arms spending in Ukraine on the basis they’ve lost count!!! It also reveals that the psychopaths want Ukraine to be another ‘forever war’.)
Haven’t you had enough yet? When are you going to do something about it?
Let me know after you’ve had your nails done, drunk the Cool Aid with the ladies that lunch, and coloured in the next page of your adult colouring book (FFS!) to help stem the growing inner discomfort which comes from you know not where.
But, know this… every generation has faced the proposition of either ending war or staying silent. They have chosen silence, in the main.
They had that luxury.
We don’t!
If we stay silent this will be the end.
We are facing the Atlantean challenge.
And, we are just about to annihilate ourselves unless we learn the spiritual lessons inherent in this moment.
These are:
Personal responsibility
Sharing
And, before you pull a face and announce that you’re off “down the beach”, consider this…
Learning to take responsibility means, simply, to be able to respond.
It’s response - ability.
Being able to respond means that you know who you are and how you feel.
That is freedom, in a nutshell!
Sharing is what we do when we get in contact with our hearts… when we care enough about others to act… (it’s what I’m doing now…). But sharing, in a caring way, isn’t all about saying “Ooh, nice nails!”
That’s just indulgence!
That’s just perpetuating the ‘same old’, which will simply serve to compound the old paradigm.
The old paradigm that we desperately need to leave behind, right now.
But, sharing the truth, so that others might see it for what it is, is what shall set us free from the psychopaths who herd us, like sheep, toward our own destruction.
The question is:
Are you already broken? Or, in your fractured state, can you get off your knees and make a difference?
I, for one, pledge my broken body, and my broken heart, to the service of Truth.
To freedom.
To the better world I know is possible if we all stand united in Love.
War is the chosen way, but it, most certainly IS NOT the only way, to resolve our differences.
War is a choice to make a huge leap towards darkness and evil, because war is used to conquer and control others, whilst at the same time creating vast wealth for a very few.
There’s no money to be made in times of stability. Fluctuations in money markets are required for the predators and parasites, who work at fraudulent financial institutions, to cream off huge profits, whether we win or lose the fight.
(Btw, we, the little people, ALWAYS lose the fight, because we always pay for it! In blood. In money. In peace of mind. In broken hearts. These are the costs of war… but not to the psychopaths!)
We are entering the age of enlightenment. But, the gatekeepers of the old order don’t want to let us past.
If we all wake up, we will see the atrocities of the old order for what they are. They will lose their wealth, their power, their stature. And, if we learn nothing at all, they will lose their heads, as well.
But, if we learn to love, we will remove them from their positions of power, give them a set of Sharpies, and say, “There you go Bill, why don’t you get to work on your new colouring book?”
This is what the Dalai Lama says about war…
Of course, war and the large military establishments are the greatest sources of violence in the world.
Whether their purpose is defensive or offensive, these vast powerful organizations exist solely to kill human beings. We should think carefully about the reality of war. Most of us have been conditioned to regard military combat as exciting and glamorous - an opportunity for men to prove their competence and courage. Since armies are legal, we feel that war is acceptable; in general, nobody feels that war is criminal or that accepting it is a criminal attitude. In fact, we have been brainwashed. War is neither glamorous nor attractive. It is monstrous. Its very nature is one of tragedy and suffering.
War is like a fire in the human community, one whose fuel is living beings. I find this analogy especially appropriate and useful. Modern warfare waged primarily with different forms of fire, but we are so conditioned to see it as thrilling that we talk about this or that marvellous weapon as a remarkable piece of technology without remembering that, if it is actually used, it will burn living people.
War also strongly resembles a fire in the way it spreads. If one area gets weak, the commanding officer sends in reinforcements. This is throwing live people onto a fire.
But, because we have been brainwashed to think this way, we do not consider the suffering of individual soldiers. No soldiers want to be wounded or die. None of his loved ones wants any harm to come to him. If one soldier is killed, or maimed for life, at least another five or ten people - his relatives and friends - suffer as well. We should all be horrified by the extent of this tragedy, but we are too confused.
Frankly, as a child, I too was attracted to the military. Their uniform looked so smart and beautiful. But, that is exactly how the seduction begins.
Children start playing games that will one day lead them into trouble.
There are plenty of exciting games to play and costumes to wear other than those based on the killing of human beings.
Again, if we, as adults, were not so fascinated by war, we would clearly see that to allow our children to become habituated to war games is extremely unfortunate.
Some former soldiers have told me that when they shot their first person they felt uncomfortable, but as they continued to kill it began to feel quite normal. In time, we can get used to anything.
It is not only during times of war that military establishments are destructive. By their very design, they are the single greatest violators of human rights, and it is the soldiers themselves who suffer most consistently from their abuse.
After the officer in charge have given beautiful explanations about the importance of the army, its discipline and the need to conquer the enemy, the rights of the great mass of soldiers are almost entirely taken away. They are then compelled to forfeit their individual will, and, in the end, to sacrifice their lives. Moreover, once an army has become a powerful force, there is every risk that it will destroy the happiness of its own country.
Addendum: 22.09.22 :: A brilliant article today by Jon Rappaport:
The prodigious author and researcher, Antony Sutton (1925-2002), wrote about hidden men behind momentous events.
In 1999, Kris Millegan, researcher and head of TrineDay publishers, wrote:
“Antony C. Sutton, 74, has been persecuted but never prosecuted for his research and subsequent publishing of his findings. His mainstream career was shattered by his devotion towards uncovering the truth. In 1968, his Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development was published by The Hoover Institute at Stanford University. Sutton showed how the Soviet state's technological and manufacturing base, which was then engaged in supplying the North Vietnamese the armaments and supplies to kill and wound American soldiers, was built by US firms and mostly paid for by the US taxpayers. From their largest steel and iron plant, to automobile manufacturing equipment, to precision ball-bearings and computers, basically the majority of the Soviet's large industrial enterprises had been built with the United States help or technical assistance.”
Here is a telling Antony Sutton quote from his book, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy (1986):
“By using data of Russian origin it is possible to make an accurate analysis of the origins of this equipment. It was found that all the main diesel and steam-turbine propulsion systems of the ninety-six Soviet ships on the Haiphong supply run [to the North Vietnamese] that could be identified (i.e., eighty-four out of the ninety-six) originated in design or construction outside the USSR. We can conclude, therefore, that if the [US] State and Commerce Departments, in the 1950s and 1960s, had consistently enforced the legislation passed by Congress in 1949, the Soviets would not have had the ability to supply the Vietnamese War – and 50,000 more Americans and countless Vietnamese would be alive today.”
“Who were the government officials responsible for this transfer of known military technology? The concept originally came from National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, who reportedly sold President Nixon on the idea that giving military technology to the Soviets would temper their global territorial ambitions. How Henry arrived at this gigantic non sequitur is not known. Sufficient to state that he aroused considerable concern over his motivations. Not least that Henry had been a paid family employee of the Rockefellers since 1958 and has served as International Advisory Committee Chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank, a Rockefeller concern.”
If you think such traitorous actions could never have occurred, I point you to another researcher, Charles Higham, and his 1983 classic, Trading with the Enemy.
Higham focuses on World War 2. The men behind the curtain Higham exposed are in the same basic group that Antony Sutton exposed.
Higham, Trading with the Enemy:
"What would have happened if millions of American and British people, struggling with coupons and lines at the gas stations, had learned that in 1942 Standard Oil of New Jersey [part of the Rockefeller empire] managers shipped the enemy's [Germany’s] fuel through neutral Switzerland and that the enemy was shipping Allied fuel? Suppose the public had discovered that the Chase Bank in Nazi-occupied Paris after Pearl Harbor was doing millions of dollars' worth of business with the enemy with the full knowledge of the head office in Manhattan [the Rockefeller family among others?] Or that Ford trucks were being built for the German occupation troops in France with authorization from Dearborn, Michigan? Or that Colonel Sosthenes Behn, the head of the international American telephone conglomerate ITT, flew from New York to Madrid to Berne during the war to help improve Hitler's communications systems and improve the robot bombs that devastated London? Or that ITT built the FockeWulfs that dropped bombs on British and American troops? Or that crucial ball bearings were shipped to Nazi-associated customers in Latin America with the collusion of the vice-chairman of the U.S. War Production Board in partnership with Goering's cousin in Philadelphia when American forces were desperately short of them? Or that such arrangements were known about in Washington and either sanctioned or deliberately ignored?"
Getting the picture?
War, what is it good for? With the same elites backing both sides, it’s good for business. It’s good for creating chaos and destruction. It’s good for launching new global organizations, in the aftermath; organizations that exert a level of control and reach that didn’t exist before. It’s good for launching organizations like the United Nations and the European Union and the World Trade Organization---dedicated to Globalism, which in turn is dedicated to planned civilization, in which the individual is demeaned and the group is All.
Freedom is demeaned; and dominance by the few over the many is hailed as peace in our time.
The purpose of war is to keep the powerful in power, or to increase their power.
Power is threatened by the economic system nearing collapse from gross corruption over a very long time. It is threatened by a less corrupt alternative which Russia, China, Iran, India, Brazil and others are rapidly building.
The only possible answer is to nuke an American military base in Germany and blame it on Russia and China...
Certainly you see the logic?